the great classic of Spanish football was played and won by a tight Barcelona 2-1. Although perhaps less off the result. Again, The referee was in the spotlight. Undiano Mallenco not gave a penalty in two plays “decisive” Butragueño would say that it might well be. There were hand (that is voluntary or involuntary tastes) Adriano at the end of the first part and there was Ronaldo Mascherano load in the second half (the question is whether the charge was enough to point penalty). Of course, others called Cesc penalty and red card to Sergio Ramos.
Having said that, the question is clear: Who of the two great harm more referees? ¿At Madrid or Barcelona? Obviated the 18 remaining teams suffer the rigors and arbitration rulings (just check the penalty area pointed out by Muñiz Fernández Levante that outraged Espanyol), nor Blaugrana and Real Madrid have cause for complaint.
this League, Madrid won the controversy over Elche at the last minute with a penalty famous Pepe. Champions, they had to defeat Juve by 2-1 after the Italians to stay with 10 at the beginning of the second act and Ramos suffered a penalty in the first half. And both against Malaga as before Betis, The referee always took home option at the slightest doubt.
Three quarters of the same can be applied to Barcelona. Still squeaks that past stoppage time goal that gave the victory against Sevilla, after the hispalenses them somewhat nullified legal. And the slightest doubt, rare is the day that the club is not favored. So that, who is right in this new debate about which team I usually see most favored by the arbitration deal.
difficult to choose, especially, when droppers have the times you have been hurt in the past five years. Last was the Madrid derby which was favored with no penalty signaling Alexis Ramos. This time it seems that Barcelona is the best stand. What is clear is that only when they play among them complain. For something will.